← All testing lab reviews

Testing laboratory · Reviewed 2026-09-03

Freedom Diagnostics Testing review

Operational read
Operating lab; accreditation unconfirmed
Operating history
Established in 2023
Accreditation
No ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation confirmed

Legitimacy review

Is Freedom Diagnostics Testing legit?

Qualified yes

Freedom is a real, active peptide-testing service with published methods, pricing, named report signers, and a large official report archive. Its legal ownership remains unresolved, no formal peptide-testing accreditation was located, and public analytical-performance allegations remain unproven.

Operating identity

Freedom Diagnostics Testing lists 133 Holiday Ct, Suite 106, Franklin, Tennessee and says it was established in 2023. Kris Ryan identifies himself in interviews as one of the owners and describes about 15 years of laboratory experience; those claims were not reconciled to a public legal entity. Issued COAs name Stephen Schmidt and later Alex Johnson as principal chemists, but issuer-hosted biographies were not located.

Operating history and strongest evidence

A fixed Franklin intake address, public methods and pricing, detailed staff interviews, a record-specific certificate registry with 62,278 report files indexed on September 3, and a recurring corpus of issued COAs.

Accreditation scope

The company says it follows ISO 9001 quality-management and GLP principles. Those statements are not an ISO/IEC 17025 laboratory accreditation, and no issuer certificate and scope naming Freedom was located.

Methods and intake

Freedom states that every COA combines HPLC-UV purity with LC-MS identity. Its intake form also offers net peptide content, endotoxin, conformity, and other add-on panels, with a current advertised two-to-four-business-day average turnaround. A September 2025 interview describes intake scanning, sample tracking, replicates, separate endotoxin vials, and publication to the customer portal; its older 24-to-48-hour target is historical, not the current service promise.

Public service record

Recent Reddit threads contain favorable communication and turnaround anecdotes alongside serious disputed dry-labbing allegations. The threads do not resolve those allegations and are not a substitute for method or proficiency evidence.

Important limits

Legal entity, ownership, staff qualifications, accreditation, and disputed analytical-performance claims remain unresolved; file volume is not measurement-performance evidence. The operating-history claim and service claims are primarily first-party. Community allegations are presented only as attributed, unresolved reports.

Additional operating evidence

Freedom Diagnostics Testing says it has operated from Franklin, Tennessee since 2023. Its published workflow combines HPLC purity analysis with mass-spectrometry identity confirmation, while net peptide content, endotoxin, sterility, heavy-metal, and conformity testing depend on the ordered scope.

Verification context

The public lookup accepts a printed Search Code, accession number, or company name. Search Code is the strongest human-facing input because the laboratory explains where it appears and how it is formed; exact official PDFs are stronger destinations than a populated generic search page.

An observable Franklin testing operation

Freedom publishes a Franklin, Tennessee address, a current intake form, pricing, methods, turnaround, and a large official COA repository. Interviews identify Kris Ryan as one of the owners and describe the intake and review workflow, while issued certificates name principal chemists Stephen Schmidt and Alex Johnson. Those are strong signs of an active service, although a legal suffix and primary ownership record remain unconfirmed.

The company says it was established in 2023, while the current domain was registered in February 2025. That difference can reflect a prior offline or differently branded operation and is not evidence against the claim, but independent public substantiation of the earlier start date was not located.

The CLIA credential attached to the wrong Freedom

Several directories attribute CLIA number 14D2263999 to the Franklin peptide lab. That credential resolves instead to Freedom Diagnostic Testing, PLLC in Hillsboro, Illinois, associated with Sara Beth Duff and a waived clinical collection operation. The Tennessee lab's own site and reviewed COAs do not publish that number.

Unless Freedom documents corporate continuity, the Illinois credential must not be used to describe the Tennessee operation as CLIA-certified. Freedom's statements about ISO 9001 quality-management and GLP principles are also not ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, and no peptide-testing certificate and scope naming the Franklin operation was located.

Methods, prices, and certificate controls

Freedom states that its standard certificate combines HPLC-UV purity with LC-MS identity. Its May 2026 intake form lists purity and identity at $200, net content as a $25 add-on, endotoxin at $175, PCR sterility at $150, conformity testing at $50 per additional vial, and fentanyl screening at $40. The homepage advertises an average two-to-four-business-day turnaround.

The verifier accepts a Search Code, a 10-digit accession number, or an exact company name. A successful match reaches a record-specific official PDF. Search Code combines the first four characters of the submitted company name with the accession number; when an accession maps to more than one file, the complete code is required. The identifier should remain copyable wherever PeptidePrices presents the report.

Scale and the unresolved performance debate

Freedom's report storage exposed 62,278 file keys on September 3, 2026 while the homepage displayed 42,378-plus COAs. That makes the official homepage counter materially stale, but a file-key count is an operating-footprint measure—not proof that every file is unique or every assay is accurate.

Public discussion contains favorable reports about speed and cross-lab agreement alongside dry-labbing allegations, questions about unusually frequent passing results, and complaints about endotoxin interpretation. No regulator finding or controlled proficiency study resolving those claims surfaced. PeptideCritic's profile is also stale on current pricing and publication policy, so its alleged blind-identification failure should remain an attributed, unresolved claim unless the underlying records become available.

COA verification

Can I check a Freedom Diagnostics Testing COA?

Submit the printed Search Code or accession number to Freedom's public lookup and compare the returned official PDF field by field.

Official destination
Portal search or a direct official PDF for the exact certificate.
What you need
Search Code + Accession Number
Exact-link rule
Normalize the printed Search Code by removing spaces; matching is case-insensitive. The lab defines it as the first four company-name characters followed by the accession number. A direct record uses https://coas.freedomdiagnosticstesting.com/<search-code>.pdf; never infer the company prefix when the certificate is unclear.
Stored identifiers complete?
No
Record-specific links?
No
Identifier copyable?
No

Identifiers on the certificate

  • Search CodeThe top-right certificate table, in the field labeled Search Code.
  • Accession NumberThe certificate identification table; it is the numeric portion of the Search Code and is accepted by the official lookup.

Result handling

How each verification state is reported

Exact match

Use only when the official destination returns the same identifier and the material certificate fields agree.

No match

Use only after a functioning official lookup explicitly returns no record for the submitted identifier.

Conflict

Use when the official destination resolves the identifier but returns a different report, product, batch, or other material identity field.

Portal unavailable

CAPTCHA, login, timeout, rate limit, outage, or an unusable response remains portal unavailable, not an invalid certificate.

Unsupported lab

Not applicable to the current Freedom adapter; use unresolved if the certificate lacks a usable lookup identifier.

Unresolved

Use when the issuer identity, required identifier, or official workflow cannot be established from the available evidence.

Certificate structure

Multi-page and multi-panel reports

Multi-page

Retain and display every page in order. The corpus ranges from 1 to 12 pages, and PeptidePrices' report viewer supports page-by-page display.

Multi-panel

Keep purity, identity, net peptide content, endotoxin, microbial, heavy-metal, and other panels distinct; verification of one panel does not imply that an unreported panel passed.

Evidence boundaries

What the record does—and does not—connect

Certificate identity
A certificate file, its printed identifiers, and its retained fingerprint identify that document only.
Issuer verification
A matching Freedom-hosted PDF verifies that Freedom issued that report with those fields; it does not verify the vendor's broader inventory.
Tested sample
The report describes only the sample identified on the certificate; it does not establish how the sample was selected.
Product matching
Match a report to a product only when the compound, strength or formulation, and lot or batch agree exactly.
Physical-vial custody
Physical-vial custody is unknown unless a documented chain connects the tested sample to the specific vial in hand.

Review receipts

Records and discrepancies checked

Representative records

  • coa:37a6d1341dca9da5b26e4c26Orbitrex Selank 30 mg, lot SEL30926A, accession 2608180450: issuer-verified with a direct official PDF.
  • coa:016a3b5a63aad18c667f2b3fSKO Selank 10 mg, lot SKO-SELNK-10-001, accession 2606150649: explicit issuer-record-not-found and correctly excluded from public display rather than promoted.
  • coa:01834cd120b9d2248a47fa64Ascend Amino record: portal unavailable or unresolved; this state is not evidence that the certificate is invalid.

Concrete discrepancies

  • Twenty-four of 834 retained Freedom records lack a public copyable verifier identifier; current coverage is 810/834.
  • Twelve public issuer-verified records have no retained official URL, and 771 verified records resolve only to the generic lookup page in the latest receipt rather than a specific official PDF.
  • The 21 explicit no-match records and two unresolved records are kept out of the public library, which is the correct non-promotion behavior.

Sources

Evidence used for this review

  1. Freedom Diagnostics Testing COA lookupofficial_portal
  2. Freedom Diagnostics Testing community discussionsecondary_review
  3. Freedom Diagnostics Testing laboratory profileofficial
  4. Freedom Diagnostics peptide testing intake formofficial_method
  5. Freedom Diagnostics Testingofficial
  6. Freedom Diagnostics May 2026 intake formofficial_method
  7. Freedom public COA lookupofficial_portal
  8. Representative Freedom official PDFcertificate_example
  9. Interview with Kris Ryan of Freedom Diagnosticssecondary_interview
  10. August 2026 Freedom interviewsecondary_interview
  11. NPPES record for the Illinois namesakeregulator
  12. Freedom Diagnostics community discussionsecondary_review
  13. Disclosed Labs Freedom profileaggregator

Reusable integration rule: For future vendors, capture the printed Search Code and accession separately, preserve all pages, store the direct Freedom PDF returned by the lookup, and require exact product and lot agreement before matching it to a listing.

Frequently asked questions

Questions readers ask about this laboratory

Is Freedom Diagnostics Testing legitimate?

Qualified yes. Freedom is a real, active peptide-testing service with published methods, pricing, named report signers, and a large official report archive. Its legal ownership remains unresolved, no formal peptide-testing accreditation was located, and public analytical-performance allegations remain unproven.

What testing methods does Freedom Diagnostics Testing use?

Freedom states that every COA combines HPLC-UV purity with LC-MS identity. Its intake form also offers net peptide content, endotoxin, conformity, and other add-on panels, with a current advertised two-to-four-business-day average turnaround. A September 2025 interview describes intake scanning, sample tracking, replicates, separate endotoxin vials, and publication to the customer portal; its older 24-to-48-hour target is historical, not the current service promise.

Is Freedom Diagnostics Testing accredited for peptide testing?

No ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation confirmed. The company says it follows ISO 9001 quality-management and GLP principles. Those statements are not an ISO/IEC 17025 laboratory accreditation, and no issuer certificate and scope naming Freedom was located.

How do I verify a Freedom Diagnostics Testing COA?

Submit the printed Search Code or accession number to Freedom's public lookup and compare the returned official PDF field by field.

Can a vendor influence a Freedom Diagnostics Testing result?

The reviewed sources did not establish that vendors can purchase a passing result from Freedom Diagnostics Testing. That is not an audited independence guarantee: sample selection, who pays, publication rights, blind-testing controls, and correction history still matter.

Does a verified Freedom Diagnostics Testing COA prove that my vial was tested?

Physical-vial custody is unknown unless a documented chain connects the tested sample to the specific vial in hand.

Does a missing Freedom Diagnostics Testing verification result mean the COA is fake?

CAPTCHA, login, timeout, rate limit, outage, or an unusable response remains portal unavailable, not an invalid certificate.

Check the document

Apply this review to a specific certificate

Open the COA checker