← All testing lab reviews

Testing laboratory · Reviewed 2026-09-03

SteriGenix Analytical, LLC review

Operational read
Very young lab; ownership transfer underway
Operating history
Public web footprint observed in 2026
Accreditation
Not accredited; ISO 17025-aligned claim

Legitimacy review

Is SteriGenix Analytical, LLC legit?

SteriGenix presents as a real new testing operation, but its identity and continuity are not mature enough for a strong institutional verdict. The ownership transfer, missing legal and leadership disclosures, and conflicting policy details warrant follow-up.

Operating identity

The site names SteriGenix Analytical, LLC and Jacksonville, Florida but no street address, owner, founder, director, or analyst. The current homepage says orders and new accounts are paused during a transfer of ownership.

Operating history and strongest evidence

Specific instruments and services, public pricing, a record verifier, and an explicit current operational pause.

Accreditation scope

The company explicitly says it is not accredited or cGMP registered. Alignment language is not certification.

Methods and intake

The site names HPLC, LC-MS, LAL, Karl Fischer, and GC-MS instruments and publishes standard, extended, and rush prices. Extended turnaround and raw-data-retention periods conflict across pages.

Public service record

PeptideCritic reports a May 2026 domain appearance and missing entity details. Public operating history is too short for a meaningful customer track record.

Important limits

Ownership, legal registration, address, personnel, continuity after transfer, turnaround, and record-retention terms are unresolved. A temporary pause or young domain does not prove invalidity; it does reduce the available operating-history evidence.

COA verification

Can I check a SteriGenix Analytical, LLC COA?

Enter the batch number, report number, or catalog number printed on the COA, then compare the returned report fields.

Official destination
Exact official record permalink
What you need
Batch or catalog number + Report number
Exact-link rule
Append the URL-encoded printed verifier identifier to /verify/. Use the exact identifier accepted by the issuer and never infer a missing suffix.
Stored identifiers complete?
Yes
Record-specific links?
Yes
Identifier copyable?
Yes

Identifiers on the certificate

  • Batch or catalog numberUpper-right of the original PDF and commonly on the product label.
  • Report numberReport header or certificate identification block.

Result handling

How each verification state is reported

Exact match

Verify only when the permalink returns the expected report and its material fields match the retained certificate.

No match

Record an explicit portal no-record response as no match, not as proof of fabrication.

Conflict

Quarantine the record when the identifier resolves to materially different issuer metadata; do not promote it.

Portal unavailable

Treat a CAPTCHA, login, timeout, outage, private record, or other portal failure as unknown.

Unsupported lab

Retain the certificate as document-only evidence and use the issuer contact route without claiming verification.

Unresolved

Keep the record unresolved until an exact issuer result or documented issuer confirmation is available.

Certificate structure

Multi-page and multi-panel reports

Multi-page

Keep every page. All 41 retained reports are multi-page and some have three pages.

Multi-panel

Keep purity, identity, content, sterility, endotoxin, and other panels as distinct reported scopes; all 41 records are multi-panel.

Evidence boundaries

What the record does—and does not—connect

Certificate identity
The retained file, fingerprint, and printed fields identify the certificate artifact.
Issuer verification
An exact issuer lookup confirms an issuer record for that certificate; it does not expand the reported scope.
Tested sample
The findings apply only to the sample described on the certificate.
Product matching
The seller product, strength, and lot must be matched to the tested sample separately.
Physical-vial custody
Neither the certificate nor its portal proves custody of the physical vial a buyer receives.

Review receipts

Records and discrepancies checked

Representative records

  • coa:02a4fc0681bcc1d8e33beb69Purgo Labs MOTS-c 10MG, verifier ID PL-MOT10-06, report RPT-2026-332585; exact issuer record matched.
  • coa:48a3b31a5e40089901061413Purgo Labs CJC-1295 / Ipamorelin blend, verifier ID PL-CJID10-03, report RPT-2026-601030; second-pass audit returned no record.

Concrete discrepancies

  • The second-pass receipt classifies coa:48a3b31a5e40089901061413 as an explicit issuer no-record result, while the current database labels it portal_unavailable.
  • The identifier for that same record contains CJID while the retained lot is PL-CJIP10-03; the value must not be silently normalized.

Sources

Evidence used for this review

  1. SteriGenix COA verifierofficial_portal
  2. SteriGenix Analyticalofficial
  3. SteriGenix pricingofficial_method

Reusable integration rule: Persist every accepted printed identifier, construct the encoded /verify/{identifier} permalink, and compare returned identity fields before verifying.

Check the document

Apply this review to a specific certificate

Open the COA checker