Operating identity
Krause Analytical, LLC describes a minority-owned Austin lab led by principal scientist Mark Krause. It distinguishes the 8711 Burnet Rd laboratory from the 8127 Mesa Dr receiving and mailing address.
Testing laboratory · Reviewed 2026-09-03
Krause Analytical, LLC · Austin, Texas, USA
Legitimacy review
Krause has credible operating identity and experienced technical leadership, but peptide services should not inherit accreditation from environmental-laboratory markings without a current method, matrix, and analyte scope.
Krause Analytical, LLC describes a minority-owned Austin lab led by principal scientist Mark Krause. It distinguishes the 8711 Burnet Rd laboratory from the 8127 Mesa Dr receiving and mailing address.
Named experienced principal scientist, clearly separated facility and mailing addresses, broad contract-testing practice, and historic issued reports.
Historical reports display ISO/NELAP TX02610. NELAP accreditation is method-, analyte-, and matrix-specific; no current official scope linking that number to peptide assays was located.
The lab advertises chromatography, spectroscopy, residual solvents, metals, and peptide safety panels. Pricing and turnaround are quote-based.
No substantial independent customer-review corpus was found.
Current accreditation status and peptide scope, ownership details beyond self-description, prices, and turnaround remain unresolved. Historical accreditation wording cannot establish current scope or peptide competence.
COA verification
Submit name, email, the original unaltered COA file, and optional vendor name through the official manual review form.
Result handling
Verify only when the official issuer record exactly matches the certificate identity.
An explicit official no-record response is unresolved evidence, not proof that the certificate is invalid.
Quarantine the record when the identifier resolves to materially different issuer metadata; do not promote it.
Treat CAPTCHA, upload failure, delayed response, or no response as unavailable, never as a certificate failure.
Retain the certificate as document-only evidence and use the issuer contact route without claiming verification.
Keep the record unresolved until an exact issuer result or documented issuer confirmation is available.
Certificate structure
Upload and retain the complete original. Both records are multi-page and one has three pages.
Preserve every panel and certification page; one retained record contains multiple panels.
Evidence boundaries
Review receipts
Public search record
Official testing, about, and verification pages dominate current search results. Independent public review coverage appears limited.
Sources
Reusable integration rule: Retain the original file and all pages, route to the official upload form, and record a manual issuer response without inferring anything from CAPTCHA or silence.
Check the document