← All testing lab reviewsOperating identity
AV Analytics names Jason Snitker and Vanessa Montoya-Uribe, PhD, as founders. Its site and certificates give a College Station, Texas address. The reviewed certificates name Jason Snitker as analyst and Vanessa Montoya, PhD, as technical reviewer.
Operating history and strongest evidence
Five complete three-page original-file matches, explicit client and sample fields, repeat-vial measurements and a report-specific public lookup.
Accreditation scope
The reviewed first-party pages and certificates did not establish an independently confirmed ISO/IEC 17025 scope for the peptide methods discussed here.
Methods and intake
Published prices are $170 for identity and purity, $215 including net content, $125 for endotoxin and $150 for the nine-metal panel. Bundle A combines identity, purity, content and endotoxin for $315. Full Panel A adds metals and growth-based sterility for $600. Standard UPLC-MS, rFC, ICP-MS and growth-based sterility work is quoted at 5–7 business days after sample acceptance. A 24-hour rush request requires prior approval and doubles the base analysis price.
Public service record
The review confirms first-party service documentation and specific original reports. It did not establish a controlled blind comparison or proficiency-testing dataset.
Important limits
The 37-report Bench Grade collection includes 32 exact certificate numbers that the current public lookup does not return. Matching originals name Aurevia Bioscience and need a separate retail-vendor attribution chain. Public documentation and complete-report review, without an on-site inspection or independently commissioned blind testing.
A named Texas laboratory and founders
AV Analytics describes itself as an independent laboratory in College Station, Texas. Its founders are Jason Snitker and Vanessa Montoya-Uribe, PhD. The address printed on the reviewed reports matches its website. Authoritative domain records date avanalytical.com to April 22, 2026, which establishes the domain’s age rather than a corporate founding date.
What the reviewed reports actually measure
The matched Cartalax, DSIP, Pinealon, Thymosin Alpha-1 and Retatrutide reports each retain three pages. Their four analytical categories are chromatographic purity, mass-spectrometry identity, net content and endotoxin. The reports show individual measurements for three submitted vials and supporting chromatograms or mass spectra. The endotoxin pages use recombinant Factor C fluorescence, with results and assay controls reported separately.
Specific originals and report-by-report lookup
Five of 37 AV certificate numbers hosted by Bench Grade returned public records on November 4, 2026. All five full laboratory PDFs matched the vendor-hosted copies byte for byte. The other 32 exact numbers returned no record. Those outcomes belong to the individual certificates. The returned PDFs name Aurevia Bioscience as client, so issuer verification alone does not establish their relationship to a different retailer.
A broader menu than the reviewed certificates
The current service menu includes a nine-metal ICP-MS panel, rapid growth-based sterility, water content, pH, benzyl alcohol analysis and stability studies as well as core peptide testing. Those advertised capabilities are separate from the assays actually present in an older report. Full Panel A costs $600 per sample and combines six categories, while the reviewed three-page examples contain four.
Prices, acceptance and turnaround
The laboratory quotes identity and purity at $170 per sample, identity, purity and content at $215, and its four-category Bundle A at $315. Standard analytical work takes 5–7 business days from acceptance. The laboratory reviews the sample matrix, condition and requested specifications before accepting the scope. Published rush work requires approval, and a microbial growth cycle still takes its required time.
Accreditation and analytical performance
An independently confirmed accredited peptide-method scope was not established in this review. The public reports and service descriptions support a finding that the laboratory issues detailed analytical documents. Separate evidence would be needed to assess proficiency across blinded samples or performance against other laboratories.
COA verification
Can I check a AV Analytics COA?
Enter the full certificate number at the laboratory’s CoA Search page, open the returned PDF, and compare every page with the supplied original.
- Official destination
- Public certificate lookup and original laboratory PDF
- What you need
- Certificate number
- Exact-link rule
- The public lookup accepts a full certificate number. A successful record supplies its PDF through /api/coas/<certificate number>/pdf on www.avanalytical.com. Preserve the leading zeros printed in the number.
- Stored identifiers complete?
- Yes
- Record-specific links?
- Yes
- Identifier copyable?
- Yes
Identifiers on the certificate
- Certificate numberThe certificate header, for example COA-2026-00284.
Result handling
How each verification state is reported
Exact match
The public lookup returns the identifier and its complete laboratory PDF matches the retained original.
No match
The functioning public lookup returns no record for the exact printed certificate number. Recheck transcription and retain that report-specific result.
Conflict
Record a materially different sample, client, lot or analytical result when comparing the returned document.
Portal unavailable
A blocked, timed-out or unusable response leaves the lookup unresolved.
Unsupported lab
AV Analytics is a reference-only laboratory outside the fixed automated checker dataset.
Unresolved
A retained report without an independently matched issuer record remains a checked document.
Certificate structure
Multi-page and multi-panel reports
Multi-page
The five matched reports each contain three pages covering results, supporting chromatograms and sample photographs, and the endotoxin assay. Retain all three pages.
Multi-panel
Count identity, purity, net content and endotoxin as four categories. Three vial measurements, control recoveries and instrument-validity checks are supporting detail within those categories.
Evidence boundaries
What the record does—and does not—connect
- Certificate identity
- The full certificate number identifies the public record. A complete-PDF byte match confirms the supplied document is the same file published by the laboratory.
- Issuer verification
- Public document authentication is separate from accreditation and independent analytical-performance evidence.
- Tested sample
- Reports identify the client, label claim, supplied lot and submitted vials. Results apply to those samples and printed methods.
- Product matching
- Match the actual vendor relationship, compound, nominal strength, formulation and lot. A sample supplied by a named wholesaler needs a documented link to the retail vendor.
- Physical-vial custody
- The public record establishes the laboratory’s submitted sample, not every vial subsequently sold by a retailer.
Review receipts
Records and discrepancies checked
Representative records
- COA-2026-00284Aurevia Bioscience Cartalax 20 mg, lot 00011/0011. Three vials received September 11 and tested September 15, with the report issued September 20, 2026. The complete three-page original reports 99.81% average purity, conforming mass-spectrometry identity, individual net-content results and recombinant Factor C endotoxin results.
Concrete discrepancies
- The November 4 check returned five exact public records among 37 AV reports hosted by Bench Grade Peptides. The other 32 printed numbers returned no record. The five returned originals matched byte for byte. The portal’s displayed record date differed from the issue date printed in those PDFs, so the printed document dates are retained with their actual roles.
Public search record
What current search results cover
First-party laboratory pages establish the named founders, College Station address, methods, prices and public lookup. Five exact complete PDF matches establish document provenance. A broader independent proficiency dataset and accredited peptide-method scope were not established.
Is AV Analytics legitimate?
Named laboratory with verifiable report originals. Yes. AV Analytics has a public analytical service, named founders and specific issued reports. Five complete three-page PDFs in this review match the laboratory’s originals. An accredited peptide-method scope and independent proficiency dataset were not established.
What testing methods does AV Analytics use?
Published prices are $170 for identity and purity, $215 including net content, $125 for endotoxin and $150 for the nine-metal panel. Bundle A combines identity, purity, content and endotoxin for $315. Full Panel A adds metals and growth-based sterility for $600. Standard UPLC-MS, rFC, ICP-MS and growth-based sterility work is quoted at 5–7 business days after sample acceptance. A 24-hour rush request requires prior approval and doubles the base analysis price.
Is AV Analytics accredited for peptide testing?
Accredited peptide-method scope not established. The reviewed first-party pages and certificates did not establish an independently confirmed ISO/IEC 17025 scope for the peptide methods discussed here.
How do I verify a AV Analytics COA?
Enter the full certificate number at the laboratory’s CoA Search page, open the returned PDF, and compare every page with the supplied original.
Can a vendor influence a AV Analytics result?
The reviewed sources did not establish that vendors can purchase a passing result from AV Analytics. That is not an audited independence guarantee: sample selection, who pays, publication rights, blind-testing controls, and correction history still matter.
Does a verified AV Analytics COA prove that my vial was tested?
The public record establishes the laboratory’s submitted sample, not every vial subsequently sold by a retailer.
Does a missing AV Analytics verification result mean the COA is fake?
A blocked, timed-out or unusable response leaves the lookup unresolved.