Nexaph vs Studz Peptides (2026 Comparison)

Prices reflect stock checks on October 15, 2026 for Nexaph and October 21, 2026 for Studz Peptides. Both scores come from the same rubric, published in the methodology.

Nexaph vs Studz Peptides: the two price tiers at a glance

Which vendor is cheaper on the 22 compounds both stock?

The catalogs overlap on 22 in-stock compounds. Nexaph is lower on 17 before codes and 16 after. Studz Peptides is lower on 5 before codes and 6 after. One standard amount of every comparable compound would cost $400.01 at Nexaph and $486.46 at Studz before codes, or $400.01 and $437.81 after them.

The gap is a package-size effect. Every Nexaph listing is a ten-vial kit, so the unit price is lower while the invoice is larger. BPC-157 is $152 for a 100 mg kit at Nexaph and $27.99 for 10 mg at Studz. GHK-Cu is $125 for 500 mg at Nexaph and $19.99 for 50 mg at Studz. NAD+ is $168 for 2500 mg at Nexaph and $29.99 for 500 mg at Studz.

Nexaph's after-code price is its list price. Studz Peptides wins five rows before the code: AOD-9604 at 57% less, Epithalon at 30% less, MOTS-c at 20% less, GLP-3R at 17% less and Sermorelin at 12% less.

Which is cheaper for GLP-3R? Studz Peptides, by 17%

Studz Peptides lists 60 mg at $109.99 and 100 mg at $184.99, or $18.33 per standard amount. Nexaph lists 60 mg at $198.00, 100 mg at $258.00, 120 mg at $298.00, 200 mg at $468.00 and 240 mg at $528.00, or $22.00 per standard amount. The code moves Studz to $16.50. Nexaph's kits reach 240 mg, but its per-standard price stays above Studz at the 60 mg and 100 mg sizes both list.

GLP-2T runs the other way. Nexaph is 19% cheaper before the code, $8.13 against $10.00 per standard amount, and still cheaper after it, $8.13 against $9.00. GLP-1S is Nexaph-only at $198.00 for 100 mg.

Whose lab paperwork is stronger? Nexaph holds the bigger archive

Nexaph's archive contains 339 reports across 40 compounds: 337 from Janoshik and two from Freedom Diagnostics. The analysis dates run October 1, 2024 to October 2, 2026, with reports in all 25 consecutive months. All 339 match official laboratory records, and 338 have confirmed Nexaph attribution. Identity and measured content appear on 337 reports, numerical purity on 271, and the printed range is 97.096% to 99.995%. Extended panels arrive from July 2026: endotoxin on 50 reports, heavy metals on 49 and TAMC/TYMC counts on 47, covering 50 of the 52 newest reports. Exact certificates cover 54 of 59 ten-vial kit options. Both archives are indexed in the COA library.

The record is not clean. Five reports since July 31, 2026 print purity below 98%, including Tesamorelin at 97.096%. One TB-500 10 mg lot measured about 75% of label. NAD+ report 85673 names Nexaph but shows AMP-branded bottles and does not verify a Nexaph listing. Finnrick's independent testing scored Nexaph 58%, with 177 of 294 samples passing and a rank of 441 of 482.

Studz retains 145 public reports: 143 with dated exact issuer matches across six laboratories, one historical ILS report with conflicting metal results and one current Vanguard report whose exact printed ID was not found. On live listings, 42 of 43 carry an exact issuer-verified certificate. The matched labs are Vanguard Laboratory (17), Freedom Diagnostics (15), ILS Laboratories (6) and SteriGenix Analytical (4), and the newest matched analysis is dated September 8, 2026. The ILS conflict is specific: a historical MOTS-C 40 mg file shows all metals as Not Detected, while the official table reports arsenic 0.065ppm, mercury 0.0865ppm and lead 0.0575ppm, all within the printed limits.

PeptidePrices scores Nexaph 9/10 (COA 10, reputation 8, transparency 7.5, operations 9) and Studz 8.5/10 (COA 9, reputation 8.5, transparency 7.5, operations 8.5). The COA factor favors Nexaph.

Is the Studz Peptides code worth 10%?

Studz Peptides carries the only reader code here. PEPTIDEPRICES takes 10% off the product subtotal, does not auto-apply, and was verified and checked on October 3, 2026. Terms are on the Studz Peptides coupon page. Nexaph has no PeptidePrices code.

On the 22 shared compounds, the code moves Studz from 5 wins to 6 and cuts its basket from $486.46 to $437.81. Nexaph stays at $400.01. The code flips SS-31 but does not change the winner on the rows Nexaph still takes.

Studz's card routes carry a 5% redirect fee or a 9% no-redirect fee. Check how the fee and the code interact on the final total before paying.

Who ships to my address, and what can I pay with?

Nexaph lists the United States, Puerto Rico, the United Kingdom and the U.S. Virgin Islands. An October 15, 2026 quote to Massachusetts for a $152 kit showed $10 UPS Ground, $20 UPS 2nd Day Air and $60 UPS Next Day Air. The policy offers free shipping over $200 in the contiguous United States. The site promises same-day dispatch before 2 p.m. Eastern; another page gives a noon Pacific cutoff. Payment options are Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Discover, U.S. checking through Link Money and cryptocurrency. Sales are final, and cancellation is allowed before dispatch.

Studz ships within the United States at current checkout. Checkout states 24 to 48 hour processing and free two-day shipping over $250. Payment options are credit or debit card, Apple Pay, Zelle, Venmo, USDC (Polygon) and Bitcoin. Card users pick a 5% redirect route or a 9% no-redirect route. Package insurance is preselected at checkout, and the shipping page still lists international destinations that checkout disables.

Practical read: Nexaph for an address outside the United States. Studz for a U.S. buyer who wants Zelle, Venmo or Apple Pay.

What do Trustpilot and independent testing say about each?

Nexaph's Trustpilot profile showed 3.9/5 from 73 reviews on October 16, 2026, with 67% five-star and 26% one-star. The profile is unclaimed and has no company replies. Positive accounts praise kit pricing, shipping and access to reports. Critical accounts allege unexpected card charges, delivery problems, poor complaint handling and inconsistent product effect. Finnrick's independent testing adds a 58% score, 177 passes among 294 classifiable samples and a rank of 441 of 482. Its compound scores include GLP-2T at 76% across 62 tests, GLP-3R at 74% across 103, Tesamorelin at 37% across 30 and GLP-1S at 33% across 15.

Studz's exact-domain profile showed 4.7/5 from 25 reviews on October 3, 2026. Readable accounts describe repeat orders, packaging, quick fulfillment and prompt support. The sample is much smaller than Nexaph's.

Ownership disclosure is thin at both. Nexaph names Shanghai Nexa Pharma Co and selects Nevis governing law. It publishes no address, phone number or named person, and its domain record dates to May 6, 2024. Studz publishes Queen Creek, Arizona contact copy but no named legal operator. Its domain was created October 4, 2025, and its contact page carries placeholder phone numbers.

Who should pick Nexaph, and who should pick Studz Peptides?

The catalogs decide more cases than the price table. Nexaph lists 58 in-stock listings across 44 compounds. Studz lists 43 across 30. They share 22.

Pick Nexaph if:

• You buy in kit quantities. Every listing is a ten-vial kit, and Nexaph is lower on 17 of 22 shared compounds.
• You need GLP-1S, TB-500, ARA-290, CJC-1295 No DAC, LL-37, Melanotan-1, Melanotan-2 or VIP. Those are among the 22 compounds only Nexaph stocks.
• You want the extended panels. 50 of the 52 newest reports carry endotoxin, heavy metals and microbial counts.
• You ship to Puerto Rico, the United Kingdom or the U.S. Virgin Islands.
• You can accept final sales and a 3.9/5 Trustpilot profile.

Pick Studz Peptides if:

• You want smaller vials and a lower first order. 10 mg and 20 mg options are common, and PEPTIDEPRICES takes 10% off the subtotal.
• You need GLP-3R, AHK-Cu, AICAR, CagriSema, Glutathione, IGF-1 LR3, Kisspeptin-10, Selank or Semax. Those eight are Studz-only.
• You want Zelle, Venmo or Apple Pay.
• You want a matched certificate on nearly every listing: 42 of 43.
• You weigh a 4.7/5 rating from 25 reviews more than a 3.9/5 rating from 73.

Either way, match the certificate to the exact product, strength and lot before you rely on it. Full reviews: Nexaph review and Studz Peptides review.

PeptidePrices has affiliate relationships with some vendors, and affiliate status carries no weight in scores.

Nexaph vs Studz Peptides FAQ

Is Nexaph or Studz Peptides cheaper?

Nexaph is cheaper on 17 of the 22 shared compounds before codes and 16 after Studz's 10% code. One standard amount of each costs $400.01 at Nexaph and $486.46 at Studz before codes, or $400.01 and $437.81 after.

Which vendor has more COA records?

Nexaph has 339 COA library records and exact certificates for 54 of 59 ten-vial kits. Studz has 145 records and exact certificates for 42 of 43 listings.

Does Studz Peptides have a coupon code?

Yes. PEPTIDEPRICES gives 10% off the product subtotal. It was verified and checked on October 3, 2026. Nexaph has no PeptidePrices code.

Which is cheaper for GLP-3R?

Studz Peptides. Its 100 mg option is $184.99, or $18.33 per standard amount, against $258.00 and $22.00 at Nexaph. The code takes Studz to $16.50.

Does Nexaph ship outside the United States?

Yes. Nexaph lists Puerto Rico, the United Kingdom and the U.S. Virgin Islands as well. Studz ships within the United States at checkout.

Are Nexaph's 339 reports independently verified?

They match official Janoshik and Freedom Diagnostics records, and 338 carry confirmed Nexaph attribution. Finnrick's separate testing scored Nexaph 58%, with 177 of 294 samples passing.